Barbados Peace CollectiveDialogue. Engagement. Understanding.

Regional and Palestinian peace process

Negotiations, peace, and unresolved questions.

Israel's peace story includes regional diplomacy with Arab states and direct negotiations with Palestinians. Both tracks overlap, diverge, and shape the search for peace.

The Peace Process in a few words

Israel's relationships across the Middle East are not one story. They include wars, boycotts, treaties, cold peace, normalization, terror, failed negotiations, security cooperation, and people-to-people efforts. The regional track and the Israeli-Palestinian track are connected, but each has its own history, pressures, and unresolved questions.

Regional peace and normalization

Israel's peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan changed the region's strategic map. Later, the Abraham Accords suggested a different model: normalization rooted in shared interests, technology, trade, security, and a belief that public relationships between Israel and Arab states can move forward even while the Palestinian question remains unresolved.

  • Egypt, who administered Gaza from 1948 to 1967 without annexing it, became the first Arab state to sign a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
  • Jordan and Israel signed a peace treaty in 1994 after decades of conflict. Jordan had controlled and annexed the West Bank - also called Judea and Samaria by many Jews and Israelis - from 1948 to 1967. King Hussein formally disengaged from West Bank claims in 1988, before the treaty.
  • The Abraham Accords normalized relations with the UAE and Bahrain in 2020 followed by agreements involving Morocco and Sudan.
  • Regional normalization can expand cooperation, but it does not by itself resolve the Palestinian question.

The Israeli-Palestinian peace track

The Israeli-Palestinian peace process is a history of real negotiations and real failures. It requires balancing Israeli security concerns, Palestinian political aspirations, terrorism and incitement, settlements, borders, Jerusalem, refugees, governance, and recognition of two peoples' national identities and ambitions.

  • Oslo created mutual recognition between Israel and the PLO and a framework for Palestinian self-government.
  • Final-status issues remained unresolved, including borders, Jerusalem, refugees, settlements, and security.
  • The Second Intifada deeply damaged Israeli public trust in the peace process.
  • Israel's 2005 disengagement from Gaza remains a major case study in withdrawal, security, and governance. After the withdrawal, Hamas eventually took control of the Gaza Strip and carried out the 2023 attack on Israel's border communities, sparking the 2023 Gaza war.
  • Debates over West Bank settlements are also debates inside Israeli society including between Israelis who support them, oppose them, or see them as a security and diplomatic liability.

Peace Process Timeline

Armistice agreements follow Israel's War of Independence, but not full peace treaties.

Egypt becomes the first Arab state to sign a peace treaty with Israel. Sinai returns to Egypt, while Gaza remains outside Egyptian sovereignty and is left for Palestinian-autonomy talks.

The Madrid Conference opens a new phase of Arab-Israeli and Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy.

Israel and the PLO exchange mutual recognition letters and sign the Oslo Declaration of Principles.

Israel and Jordan sign a peace treaty after the Washington Declaration, six years after Jordan's 1988 disengagement from West Bank claims.

Camp David talks fail; the Second Intifada begins later that year, deeply damaging Israeli trust.

The Arab Peace Initiative proposes normalization in the context of a broader Arab-Israeli settlement.

Israel unilaterally disengages from Gaza, evacuating all settlements and military installations.

The Abraham Accords normalize Israel's relations with the UAE and Bahrain, followed by agreements involving Morocco and Sudan.

Hamas terrorists attack Israelis in border towns, kibbutzim, and a music festival near Gaza, killing more than 1,200 individuals, a majority of whom were civilians, taking hostages, and triggering the deadliest Israeli-Palestinian war in decades.

A ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas takes effect after 15 months of war that includes phased hostage releases, prisoner exchanges, humanitarian aid increases, and negotiations over Gaza's future. Low-level skirmishes continue between the Israeli military and Hamas terrorists.

What peace requires

Many Israelis see recognition of the Jewish state as essential because peace is not only a border arrangement, it is an end-of-conflict commitment between two peoples. Without mutual recognition, each ceasefire or interim agreement can feel like another pause before the next round of fear and violence.

Ensuring security after withdrawal is one of the hardest Israeli lessons. Lebanon and Gaza shaped Israeli public opinion because withdrawals were followed by armed buildup and attacks. That history does not make peace impossible but it explains why Israelis question what happens the day after any territorial concession.

Regional normalization has real value even when it does not solve the Palestinian question. Treaties with Egypt and Jordan reduced the chance of regional war and the Abraham Accords opened practical cooperation in technology, medicine, energy, agriculture, tourism, and security. People-to-people ties make peace more durable than signatures alone.

Pro-Israel conversations can criticize Israeli leaders or policies without rejecting Israel's legitimacy. Serious peace discussions have to hold empathy for victims of terrorism and empathy for civilians harmed by war simultaneously.

Sources