Barbados Peace CollectiveDialogue. Engagement. Understanding.

Palestinian history

Identity, nationalism, statehood, and the unresolved conflict.

The modern Palestinian national movement emerged during the late Ottoman and British Mandate periods alongside Zionism, Arab nationalism, anti-colonial movements, and the collapse of older imperial identities across the Middle East.

Its story includes political organizing, demands for self-determination, refugee displacement, regional Arab politics, armed struggle, diplomacy, internal divisions, and repeated failures to achieve an independent Palestinian state.

A movement shaped by aspiration and conflict

Different communities tell this history very differently. Palestinians often understand their national movement through dispossession, statelessness, military occupation, refugee life, and exile. Many Israelis and pro-Israel historians also point to political rejectionism, violence against civilians, regional wars, corruption, authoritarian leadership, and missed opportunities for peace and statehood.

Modern Palestinian nationalism developed alongside other nationalist movements in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Under Ottoman rule, many local Arabs identified primarily through religion, family, village, city, or broader Arab and Syrian identity rather than a separate Palestinian nationality in the modern political sense. During the British Mandate, a more distinct Palestinian Arab political identity developed in response to British rule, Zionist immigration, regional Arab politics, and changing ideas about nationalism.

For many Palestinians, the movement centers on self-determination, return, dignity, and sovereignty. For many Israelis, the conflict is also inseparable from wars, terrorism, rejection of Jewish statehood, attacks on civilians, and fears that parts of the Palestinian national movement sought Israel's elimination rather than coexistence. Understanding the conflict requires holding both Palestinian aspirations and Israeli fears in view.

Origins of Palestinian identity

The word Palestine has ancient geographic roots and was used by Romans, Europeans, Ottomans, and British authorities long before the modern conflict. During the British Mandate, both Jews and Arabs living in the territory were often described internationally as Palestinians.

Before 1948, the term appeared in multiple contexts: The Palestine Post was a Jewish newspaper that later became The Jerusalem Post; the Palestine Philharmonic, founded by Jewish musicians, later became the Israel Philharmonic; and Mandatory Palestine passports identified both Jews and Arabs as Palestinian.

A more distinct Palestinian Arab national identity increasingly developed during the Mandate period as Arab leaders opposed Zionism, Jewish immigration, and British policies. Historians debate exactly when modern Palestinian national consciousness fully emerged, with some tracing it to the late Ottoman era and others emphasizing its consolidation in the 1920s and 1930s.

Timeline

The region is governed by the Ottoman Empire for roughly four centuries. No independent Palestinian state exists during this period.

Jewish and Arab nationalist movements develop in parallel as the Ottoman Empire weakens and modern nationalism spreads through the region.

The Balfour Declaration expresses British support for a national home for the Jewish people while stating that the rights of existing non-Jewish communities should not be prejudiced.

Palestinian Arab political identity grows during the British Mandate. Arab leaders organize protests, strikes, and nationalist movements opposing Zionism, British rule, and Jewish immigration, while violence against Jewish civilians also becomes part of the conflict in Jerusalem, Hebron, Safed, and other places.

The Hebron massacre kills dozens of Jews amid anti-Jewish violence tied to tensions around holy sites in Jerusalem. Ancient Jewish communities in Hebron are largely destroyed or displaced.

The Arab Revolt targets British authorities, Jewish communities, infrastructure, and political opponents, combining nationalism, anti-colonial anger, anti-Zionism, and internal Arab rivalries.

Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, meets Adolf Hitler in Berlin after fleeing British-controlled Palestine. His wartime alignment with Nazi Germany and Arabic anti-Jewish propaganda remain deeply controversial, even though historians generally reject claims that he created the Holocaust.

The United Nations proposes partitioning Mandatory Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. Jewish leadership accepts the plan with reservations; Arab leadership rejects it as unfair and as a violation of Arab self-determination.

Israel declares independence. Neighboring Arab states invade, and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians become refugees through a combination of displacement, fear, expulsions in some areas, social collapse, and wartime flight. Palestinians refer to this period as the Nakba, meaning catastrophe.

Jordan controls and later annexes the West Bank, while Egypt administers Gaza. No independent Palestinian state is created during this period.

The Palestine Liberation Organization is founded and initially calls for the liberation of Palestine while rejecting Israel's legitimacy. Armed struggle becomes central for many Palestinian factions.

Israel captures the West Bank and Gaza during the Six-Day War after escalating regional tensions and war with neighboring Arab states. The conflict increasingly centers on occupation, settlements, Palestinian self-determination, and control of disputed territories.

During Black September in Jordan, conflict erupts between the Jordanian government and Palestinian armed groups after Palestinian organizations challenge Jordanian authority. Thousands are killed before the PLO leadership relocates to Lebanon.

Palestinian armed groups carry out hijackings, attacks, bombings, and international terrorism campaigns. Supporters frame these actions as armed resistance; critics view them as terrorism targeting civilians.

Israel invades Lebanon after repeated attacks from Palestinian militant groups operating from southern Lebanon. Lebanon's civil war and the role of Palestinian armed organizations become major regional flashpoints.

The First Intifada begins as a Palestinian uprising against Israeli rule in the West Bank and Gaza.

The PLO formally accepts UN resolutions recognizing Israel's right to exist alongside a Palestinian state, marking a major shift in Palestinian political strategy.

Israel and the PLO sign the Oslo Accords and formally recognize one another. The Palestinian Authority is created as an interim governing body in parts of the West Bank and Gaza.

Camp David negotiations between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat fail. The Second Intifada begins later that year, deeply damaging Israeli trust in the peace process.

Israel unilaterally disengages from Gaza, removing settlements and military installations. Supporters see an opportunity for self-governance; critics fear Gaza could become a base for future attacks.

Hamas wins Palestinian legislative elections and then violently seizes control of Gaza after conflict with Fatah. The Palestinian political system splits between Hamas in Gaza and the Palestinian Authority in parts of the West Bank.

Gaza experiences repeated wars, rocket fire, Israeli military operations, blockade, humanitarian crises, and political isolation. Israel argues Hamas embeds military activity in civilian areas; critics of Israel point to civilian suffering, restrictions, displacement, and the humanitarian consequences of blockade and war.

Hamas launches a large-scale attack on southern Israel, killing approximately 1,200 people and taking more than 200 hostages, according to Israeli authorities. Israel responds with a major military campaign in Gaza, triggering one of the deadliest and most destructive wars in the history of the conflict.

Regional politics and refugees

The Palestinian national movement has been shaped not only by conflict with Israel but also by complicated relationships with surrounding Arab states. After 1948, many Palestinian refugees settled in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Gaza, and the West Bank, with conditions varying dramatically by country.

Jordan granted citizenship to many Palestinians, although tensions later erupted between Palestinian armed groups and the Jordanian monarchy. In Lebanon, many Palestinians lived for decades in refugee camps with restrictions on property ownership, employment, and political rights. In Syria, Palestinian communities experienced periods of integration alongside political repression and, later, devastating violence during the Syrian civil war.

Palestinian armed groups also became political and military actors in neighboring countries, sometimes contributing to regional instability and civil conflict. Supporters viewed these movements as part of a broader struggle for liberation and return. Critics argue some organizations prioritized armed struggle and revolutionary politics over building stable democratic institutions.

Peace process and statehood

The modern Palestinian national movement has pursued statehood through armed struggle, diplomacy, international recognition, negotiations, grassroots activism, and regional alliances. Supporters of the Palestinian cause argue Palestinians repeatedly faced occupation, statelessness, military control, settlement expansion, and unequal political power.

Many Israelis and pro-Israel observers point to repeated violence, terrorism, rejection of peace proposals, corruption, authoritarian leadership, and refusal by some Palestinian factions to permanently accept a Jewish state. The peace process remains one of the most heavily debated parts of the conflict.

Israeli governments, American negotiators, Palestinian leaders, Arab states, and international organizations continue to disagree over borders, settlements, Jerusalem, refugees, security, recognition, sovereignty, right of return, demilitarization, and control of holy sites. The conflict has repeatedly moved between diplomacy and violence.

Hamas and Gaza

Hamas emerged during the First Intifada as an Islamist movement combining Palestinian nationalism, armed resistance, and Sunni Islamist ideology. Its charter historically called for Israel's destruction, though Hamas leaders later attempted to soften some public positions without formally recognizing Israel as a Jewish state.

Supporters describe Hamas as a resistance movement responding to occupation, blockade, and failed diplomacy. Critics describe Hamas as an authoritarian Islamist organization that targets civilians, suppresses dissent, uses civilian infrastructure for military purposes, and prioritizes armed struggle over coexistence.

Since taking control of Gaza in 2007, Hamas has governed without holding new national elections. Human rights organizations and political critics have accused Hamas of political repression, torture, suppression of dissent, restrictions on free expression, and use of civilian areas for military activity. At the same time, civilians in Gaza have endured repeated wars, economic collapse, international isolation, and severe humanitarian hardship.

Democracy and governance

Questions surrounding democracy, corruption, political freedom, and governance remain central to Palestinian statehood. The Palestinian Authority holds limited self-rule powers in parts of the West Bank but has been criticized for corruption, political patronage, weak institutions, and restrictions on dissent.

Hamas governs Gaza separately and has faced accusations of authoritarian rule and suppression of opposition. Presidential and parliamentary elections have repeatedly been delayed or suspended. Critics argue Palestinian political leadership has struggled to build transparent democratic institutions capable of supporting stable statehood.

Supporters argue decades of occupation, fragmentation, violence, regional interference, and statelessness created conditions that made stable democratic development extraordinarily difficult. The result is a deeply divided political system shaped by conflict, nationalism, religion, occupation, internal rivalry, and competing visions for Palestinian society.

Sources